I usually like Bailey’s collections, and though this one is in the spirit of the previous, I have one problem : the cut of the pants ! let’s call them fat pants.
Designers have tried for years to make people look skinnier than they really are. This collection is almost counterproductive. And whereas Lanvin tries to reinterprete basics with modern cuts and fabrics, this is just a ‘copy/paste’ of the past. If we want wide-approxymately cut-high waisted pants, we just have to buy vintage clothes (or go to the Gap…). My grand-pa would love this collection.

That is funny that you mention that because a lot of articles already floating out there describe this collection as slim/skinny trousers paired with oversized outerwear.

Does Europe’s gap tend to carry clothes that are cut slim? In the US, nearly everything tends to be cut way too big and fit poorly.

Gap is not established in France, only Paris, their planning to open stores in the coming years, though. As mentionned it as a conservative mainsteam brand. Maybe J.Crew woul have been a more appropriate (even though I like some of their stuff).
Regarding the pants, I think they’re so different from what they used to be. In Burberry Prorsum’s previous collections, they were slimmer, with a wide hem (disco skinny…) I liked it, but those make these 28-inch waist models look wider than they are, and it’s neither loose, nore baggy, it’s just weirdly wide.
Moreover, the way they fall on the shoes is approximate (in a weird kind of way). It doesn’t look “négligé”… in english huhhh : classily messy (?).
That’s why I would say that this whole collection is ‘wide’.
Whatever.
Burberry is for old people.

I do notice that hem of the pants is pretty much excess, hence the weird ‘break’ on the shoes.

The only thing that I like from this collection is the little tie thingy. Might wanna try it myself hah!

我很喜欢这个秋冬的味道。来自中国的朋友的问候！