Information

This article was written on Jun 09, 2008 by and is filed under 2008, News.

Recent Articles

The Skinny in the Industry

Thought this was an inter­est­ing read to pass along.

org image 3653 The Skinny in the Industry

Now the male mod­els are los­ing weight to achieve the new boy body ideal: skinny, pale, fem­i­nine. Peter Munro reports.

model inside narrowweb  300x4850 The Skinny in the IndustryDavid Sci­ola was too big for Paris. Weigh­ing just 76 kilo­grams with a 32-​​inch waist (81cm), the 188cm-​​tall model tipped the scales in the French fash­ion capital.

Work­ing abroad last year, he lost 6kg to strut the cat­walks of Milan, but even that was not skinny enough for the Parisian scene — where lean is the new mean.

“In Milan, I trimmed down to about 76kg so I would fit the clothes. I am 6’2″, so for me I would say that’s under­weight,” he says. “Paris tends to be even skin­nier than Milan. You’ve got design­ers like Dior who always go for anaemic, 17-​​year-​​old bodies.

“In Milan, I was stay­ing with a guy who mod­elled for Dior. He was really skinny: he looked like he was going to die. He had been put on the front page of Le Monde for an arti­cle about skinny mod­els and male eat­ing dis­or­ders. But he assured me it was all totally natural.”

As Sciola’s size has dimin­ished, so his cat­walk stocks have climbed. The 23-​​year-​​old model and Uni­ver­sity of Mel­bourne media stu­dent says that three years ago he looked like a “meat head”, weigh­ing a rel­a­tively beefy 94kg with a 33-​​inch waist (83cm) and 42-​​inch chest (106cm) bulging from weight training.

“I went into Cameron’s Mod­els and they said you’ve got a good look, but you’ve got to lose weight,” he says.

“I thought they’d prob­a­bly like that big-​​body look and I would get a lot of work, but grad­u­ally I found out they don’t go for buff guys.”

Sci­ola has shed up to 18kg over three years, drop­ping weight train­ing and start­ing to jog. He even­tu­ally down­sized to an 81cm waist and 99cm chest. For him to make the cut for high-​​end fash­ion labels such as Armani in Europe, it was like a heavy­weight pro­fes­sional boxer strip­ping down three divi­sions. But, in mod­el­ling, slight men punch well above their weight.

“I have never really been told I’ve been too big, but you work it out for your­self if you are going to cast­ings and you are not fit­ting the clothes,” says Sci­ola, now back to his Aus­tralian weight of 82kg. “I don’t even go to Prada cast­ings because I know I’m not going to get the work.”

While crit­i­cal eyes have been fixed on skele­tal female mod­els — with jut­ting ribs and col­lar bones, pencil-​​thin pegs and wan com­plex­ions — their male coun­ter­parts have been qui­etly wast­ing away.

As recently as 2000, it was fash­ion­able for guys to come pack­aged with size­able pecs, biceps and a six-​​pack. Now, they are shrink­ing before our eyes.

Fash­ion houses such as Dior and Prada have long pro­moted urchins and wraiths, and even the mod­els for a recent Dolce & Gab­bana show, for which buff boys are usu­ally in vogue, seemed shrunken.

The new look can be called wil­lowy or wasted, depend­ing on your take. And it is spread­ing here, where labels such as Zambesi and Claude Maus, and fash­ion edi­to­r­ial mag­a­zines such as Russh and Yen have a pref­er­ence for raw-​​boned men.

And it’s going main­stream. Scrawn is the new brawn. And lean guys with chicken-​​chests and scrawny legs are start­ing to over­shadow the beef­cake boys.

Cameron’s Mod­els co-​​director Melinda Col­lette says skinny, geeky guys are now the poster boys for fashion’s lead­ing style mak­ers, par­tic­u­larly from abroad. “We’ve had guys who are healthy, strap­ping lads who, if they want to go to Europe or Amer­ica, have to stop going to the gym and start run­ning to lose weight,” she says.

“The 6’3″ (190cm) buff model doesn’t exist any more. I have one model here who is six foot with a 36-​​inch chest and a 32-​​inch waist, and next to him is one with a 34-​​inch chest and 31-​​inch waist. They’re a lot leaner in the chest and shoul­ders than per­haps they should be. For­merly, these two guys would have been told to go off to the gym and get a chest, but now we are not so strin­gent about that.”

Chad­wick Mod­els’ Matt Ander­son says he has taken on more lean young men to reflect the shift to scrawny in the male mod­el­ling world over the past decade.

“Now skinny guys are seen as being more attrac­tive, which is good for me because I’m a nat­u­rally skinny guy with a 30-​​inch (76cm) waist and 40-​​inch chest,” he says.

“We signed on a guy last week who is 16, tall, skinny, almost androg­y­nous. He grew up in Broad­mead­ows and is the type of guy who would have been picked on his whole life as being quite scrawny and almost effeminate-​​looking.

“Now he will feel good about him­self for the first time ever. Finally, he will feel, ‘You’re not a freak’.”

Melbourne’s mar­ket — mostly cat­a­logues and ad shoots — still suits an ath­letic build, but design­ers and retail­ers are increas­ingly on the hunt for a hun­gry, under­fed look.

Ander­son argues this trend has taken the pres­sure off male mod­els, who can now hap­pily “stay their runty selves” rather than have to work at get­ting buff — a pitch that is hotly con­tested by body-​​image specialists.

“The types of guys being used now are way more reflec­tive of the gen­eral pop­u­la­tion. Whereas 10 years ago, it was Ado­nis types with ripped (promi­nent) mus­cles and six packs,” he says.

While, accord­ing to sta­tis­tics, nearly two-​​thirds of adult men are over their healthy weight, there are plenty of nat­u­rally scrawny men out there, step­ping out from the shad­ows and swim­ming about in their skinny jeans and Brit­punk T-​​shirts.

Boki Milinkovic, 19, was street-​​cast for a fash­ion show for indie label Mate­r­ial Boy when he was in year 12 at school.

Since then, this 66kg uni stu­dent (6.3 feet, or 190cm tall) has worked his skinny butt off for other alter­na­tive labels such as Alpha60 and Mjolk, which has a fol­low­ing among frail but well-​​groomed bands includ­ing Franz Fer­di­nand and Scis­sor Sis­ters, as well as the scraggy rock­ers from Jet.

“I never had sand kicked in my face, but most of the scene is now based on kids that were picked on and who were not really that attrac­tive in the media sense,” Milinkovic says. “I’m pretty skinny, man, but I’m healthy skinny because I’ve been ath­letic my whole life.

“The whole rock’n’roll scene has been trendy for a while: the slim, nerdy guy is look­ing all cool now,” he says.

It is like Revenge of the Nerds on the cat­walk. Mate­r­ial Boy’s Mic Eaton, a for­mer surfer who has focused on design­ing since blow­ing out his knee on a wave, says mod­el­ling agen­cies such as Priscilla’s in Syd­ney are start­ing to cater more for his label’s long, lanky look.

His sam­ple size is a 76cm waist and 86cm chest, which he says suits a younger gen­er­a­tion of men more con­cerned about style than sport.

But if you are still to be con­vinced that scrawn is the new brawn, try this on for size. Eaton says the lean look is becom­ing so pop­u­lar that it might be time for hip labels such as his own to actu­ally upsize.

“I think I will be using fuller mod­els for next sea­son. I try to work against the trend,” he says. “Last sea­son, for win­ter, I did a sil­hou­ette change by using wider T-​​shirts and wider, pleated pants to give a shorter, stumpier sil­hou­ette — and it worked quite well.”

Wran­gler last year brought out a Stran­glers fit for espe­cially lean guys after dis­cov­er­ing many of its male clients were buy­ing women’s skinny stovepipe jeans. Its menswear designer Andy Pal­tos says the lean look has fil­tered down from young rock­ers and Euro­pean catwalks.

When Pal­tos was mod­el­ling in Mel­bourne a decade ago, his 81cm waist was con­sid­ered pretty small. Now, when Wran­gler fit out tour­ing groups such as Kings of Leon, they work to 71cm fits.

“I think the whole rock’n’roll look, going back to the Stones, is time­less, but I think there’s a line where you can be too skinny and look ill and wrong,” Pal­tos says.

“I think the guys are get­ting too skinny. It’s start­ing to look a bit too extreme, unhealthy.

“You can be slim and wear skinny, super-​​tight jeans and still have a bit of meat on your bones. But I’ve seen guys locally wear­ing skinny jeans who are so skinny it’s too much. There’s noth­ing on them: it’s just bones.”

Men’s body-​​image spe­cial­ist Marita McCabe, a pro­fes­sor of psy­chol­ogy at Deakin Uni­ver­sity, says the fash­ion­ably ema­ci­ated look is putting pres­sure on boys and men to meet an unre­al­is­tic ideal.

“If you are try­ing to attain a healthy body build, that is OK, but these bod­ies are so lean and so toned and that is what they see as being nor­mal,” she says. “What you are get­ting is men start­ing to engage in unhealthy eat­ing and exer­cis­ing prac­tices to try to achieve those ideals.”

Col­lette at Cameron’s Mod­els says guys don’t need to work at being lean as much as women, who have strug­gled to achieve the atro­phied, “heroin chic” body shape fash­ion cat­walks demand. But she can fore­see a time when male mod­els start starv­ing them­selves to fit on cat­walks and within magazines.

“I have not had any boys trip­ping over them­selves to get skinny, but it will prob­a­bly get to a point in maybe five years where you see boys liv­ing on cof­fee and cig­a­rettes for fashion.”

SOURCE
  • http://www.babycareindia.com/ baby

    Nice web­site!!

  • http://www.babycareindia.com/ baby

    Nice web­site!!

  • http://www.babycareindia.com/ baby

    Nice web­site!!

  • Jazz

    What is it with peo­ple lik­ing skinny mod­els?
    It infu­ri­ates me how peo­ple like the unhealthy look that I seem to be find­ing every­where.
    This is Amer­ica, we are not starv­ing. Some peo­ple need to real­ize that hav­ing a healthy weight looks bet­ter that see­ing some one’s bones through their skin. All through out his­tory men were attracted to women who had a wider girth because it was believed that they were more suited for child birth. Heck, a wom­ans curves have been appre­ci­ated all through out the his­tory of art sim­ply because they were pleas­ing to the eye. The same goes for men. I per­son­ally go for fit­ter, more ath­letic guys because they tend to be more con­fi­dent and bet­ter look­ing. Any one I’ve met who agrees with me all say that they pre­fer stronger guys so that the men will pro­tect them.

    What hap­pened to society?

    And by the way, nice article.

  • Jazz

    What is it with peo­ple lik­ing skinny mod­els?
    It infu­ri­ates me how peo­ple like the unhealthy look that I seem to be find­ing every­where.
    This is Amer­ica, we are not starv­ing. Some peo­ple need to real­ize that hav­ing a healthy weight looks bet­ter that see­ing some one’s bones through their skin. All through out his­tory men were attracted to women who had a wider girth because it was believed that they were more suited for child birth. Heck, a wom­ans curves have been appre­ci­ated all through out the his­tory of art sim­ply because they were pleas­ing to the eye. The same goes for men. I per­son­ally go for fit­ter, more ath­letic guys because they tend to be more con­fi­dent and bet­ter look­ing. Any one I’ve met who agrees with me all say that they pre­fer stronger guys so that the men will pro­tect them.

    What hap­pened to society?

    And by the way, nice article.

  • Jazz

    What is it with peo­ple lik­ing skinny mod­els?
    It infu­ri­ates me how peo­ple like the unhealthy look that I seem to be find­ing every­where.
    This is Amer­ica, we are not starv­ing. Some peo­ple need to real­ize that hav­ing a healthy weight looks bet­ter that see­ing some one’s bones through their skin. All through out his­tory men were attracted to women who had a wider girth because it was believed that they were more suited for child birth. Heck, a wom­ans curves have been appre­ci­ated all through out the his­tory of art sim­ply because they were pleas­ing to the eye. The same goes for men. I per­son­ally go for fit­ter, more ath­letic guys because they tend to be more con­fi­dent and bet­ter look­ing. Any one I’ve met who agrees with me all say that they pre­fer stronger guys so that the men will pro­tect them.

    What hap­pened to society?

    And by the way, nice article.

  • http://www.myspace.com vidx­ium

    those r great news!
    im sure i will never have a strong body like those famous mod­els.
    im super skinny n i want to be a model. so i dont need to work so hard to do it :D
    i love the new fash­ion :D
    super cool :D
    got skinny <3

  • http://www.myspace.com vidx­ium

    those r great news!
    im sure i will never have a strong body like those famous mod­els.
    im super skinny n i want to be a model. so i dont need to work so hard to do it :D
    i love the new fash­ion :D
    super cool :D
    got skinny <3

  • http://www.myspace.com vidx­ium

    those r great news!
    im sure i will never have a strong body like those famous mod­els.
    im super skinny n i want to be a model. so i dont need to work so hard to do it :D
    i love the new fash­ion :D
    super cool :D
    got skinny <3

  • Jon

    “All through out his­tory men were attracted to women who had a wider girth because it was believed that they were more suited for child birth.”

    While it is true that peo­ple believed this it is also true that those women in art which you are refer­ring to were, in fact, at an unhealthy weight– at risk for heart dis­ease, dia­betes, and numer­ous other unde­sir­able traits. This argu­ment, which I have heard so many times, is a moot point. Under­weight or over­weight– pick your poi­son. Or, don’t! Either way just sit back, relax, and enjoy the show!

    Fash­ion is art and art is extreme. If not it’s boring.

    • Juliet

      “Fash­ion is art and art is extreme. If not it’s boring.”

      Im a sur­re­al­ist painter myself, and I think that is a ridicu­lous state­ment.
      Art can be suited for soci­ety, and fash­ion is suited for a num­ber of peo­ple in soci­ety. What would gain it more attrac­tion within soci­ety was if fash­ion was MORE ARTISTIC!

      When one sys­tem is overused in art-​​people through­out his­tory start to rebel and form their own inter­pre­ta­tions of art-​​all for the sake of being dif­fer­ent, con­tro­ver­sial, and Unique!!
      What I am say­ing is: the heroin chic is overused.

      I think it would keep soci­ety on its toes and could draw more peo­ple into fash­ion and the art of cloth­ing if every once in a while-​​they actu­ally did some­thing Not boring.

      We have Seen the skinny heroin look, its won­der­ful. But how many times have you seen a hugely fat, big boned woman in high fash­ion except for Oprah? Is that ugly? There is art of these women not in the past but in the present, the fact that fat women are of his­tor­i­cal sig­nif­i­cance is an igno­rance. Plus, when Paris Hilton vis­ited whichever LDC coun­try and passed out pic­tures of her­self in a bathing suit to the vil­lage peo­ple, they were confused-​​because they think skinny is unat­trac­tive.
      We haven’t seen the healthy body with 16 – 24% body­fat, or the girl with mas­sive boobs and wierd legs, what about legs that point in or out nat­u­rally? The girl that has a neck that is too long or too short. What about a girl with cancer-​​that has no boobs? Its not a freak­show, its the nature of the body, and respect­ing the vast unique shapes and lines.
      The body is an Acces­sory Of the cloth­ing, it acts as a por­tal to a heav­enly life that is just beyond our reach.

      The con­tours of the body can pro­duce feel­ings, per­spec­tives, and thoughts. These peo­ple, they are artists of clothes but they do not know the art of the body. They are dull, it is why I am Never to be in that indus­try. Dull is in itself an art, but dull has been over­Done in this par­tic­u­lar case.

    • Juliet

      “Fash­ion is art and art is extreme. If not it’s boring.”

      Im a sur­re­al­ist painter myself, and I think that is a ridicu­lous state­ment.
      Art can be suited for soci­ety, and fash­ion is suited for a num­ber of peo­ple in soci­ety. What would gain it more attrac­tion within soci­ety was if fash­ion was MORE ARTISTIC!

      When one sys­tem is overused in art-​​people through­out his­tory start to rebel and form their own inter­pre­ta­tions of art-​​all for the sake of being dif­fer­ent, con­tro­ver­sial, and Unique!!
      What I am say­ing is: the heroin chic is overused.

      I think it would keep soci­ety on its toes and could draw more peo­ple into fash­ion and the art of cloth­ing if every once in a while-​​they actu­ally did some­thing Not boring.

      We have Seen the skinny heroin look, its won­der­ful. But how many times have you seen a hugely fat, big boned woman in high fash­ion except for Oprah? Is that ugly? There is art of these women not in the past but in the present, the fact that fat women are of his­tor­i­cal sig­nif­i­cance is an igno­rance. Plus, when Paris Hilton vis­ited whichever LDC coun­try and passed out pic­tures of her­self in a bathing suit to the vil­lage peo­ple, they were confused-​​because they think skinny is unat­trac­tive.
      We haven’t seen the healthy body with 16 – 24% body­fat, or the girl with mas­sive boobs and wierd legs, what about legs that point in or out nat­u­rally? The girl that has a neck that is too long or too short. What about a girl with cancer-​​that has no boobs? Its not a freak­show, its the nature of the body, and respect­ing the vast unique shapes and lines.
      The body is an Acces­sory Of the cloth­ing, it acts as a por­tal to a heav­enly life that is just beyond our reach.

      The con­tours of the body can pro­duce feel­ings, per­spec­tives, and thoughts. These peo­ple, they are artists of clothes but they do not know the art of the body. They are dull, it is why I am Never to be in that indus­try. Dull is in itself an art, but dull has been over­Done in this par­tic­u­lar case.

  • Jon

    “All through out his­tory men were attracted to women who had a wider girth because it was believed that they were more suited for child birth.”

    While it is true that peo­ple believed this it is also true that those women in art which you are refer­ring to were, in fact, at an unhealthy weight– at risk for heart dis­ease, dia­betes, and numer­ous other unde­sir­able traits. This argu­ment, which I have heard so many times, is a moot point. Under­weight or over­weight– pick your poi­son. Or, don’t! Either way just sit back, relax, and enjoy the show!

    Fash­ion is art and art is extreme. If not it’s boring.

  • Jon

    “All through out his­tory men were attracted to women who had a wider girth because it was believed that they were more suited for child birth.”

    While it is true that peo­ple believed this it is also true that those women in art which you are refer­ring to were, in fact, at an unhealthy weight– at risk for heart dis­ease, dia­betes, and numer­ous other unde­sir­able traits. This argu­ment, which I have heard so many times, is a moot point. Under­weight or over­weight– pick your poi­son. Or, don’t! Either way just sit back, relax, and enjoy the show!

    Fash­ion is art and art is extreme. If not it’s boring.

    • Juliet

      “Fash­ion is art and art is extreme. If not it’s boring.”

      Im a sur­re­al­ist painter myself, and I think that is a ridicu­lous state­ment.
      Art can be suited for soci­ety, and fash­ion is suited for a num­ber of peo­ple in soci­ety. What would gain it more attrac­tion within soci­ety was if fash­ion was MORE ARTISTIC!

      When one sys­tem is overused in art-​​people through­out his­tory start to rebel and form their own inter­pre­ta­tions of art-​​all for the sake of being dif­fer­ent, con­tro­ver­sial, and Unique!!
      What I am say­ing is: the heroin chic is overused.

      I think it would keep soci­ety on its toes and could draw more peo­ple into fash­ion and the art of cloth­ing if every once in a while-​​they actu­ally did some­thing Not boring.

      We have Seen the skinny heroin look, its won­der­ful. But how many times have you seen a hugely fat, big boned woman in high fash­ion except for Oprah? Is that ugly? There is art of these women not in the past but in the present, the fact that fat women are of his­tor­i­cal sig­nif­i­cance is an igno­rance. Plus, when Paris Hilton vis­ited whichever LDC coun­try and passed out pic­tures of her­self in a bathing suit to the vil­lage peo­ple, they were confused-​​because they think skinny is unat­trac­tive.
      We haven’t seen the healthy body with 16 – 24% body­fat, or the girl with mas­sive boobs and wierd legs, what about legs that point in or out nat­u­rally? The girl that has a neck that is too long or too short. What about a girl with cancer-​​that has no boobs? Its not a freak­show, its the nature of the body, and respect­ing the vast unique shapes and lines.
      The body is an Acces­sory Of the cloth­ing, it acts as a por­tal to a heav­enly life that is just beyond our reach.

      The con­tours of the body can pro­duce feel­ings, per­spec­tives, and thoughts. These peo­ple, they are artists of clothes but they do not know the art of the body. They are dull, it is why I am Never to be in that indus­try. Dull is in itself an art, but dull has been over­Done in this par­tic­u­lar case.

  • manorexic

    actu­ally we are liv­ing on diet coke and cig­a­rettes. who wants to be a fat guy?

  • manorexic

    actu­ally we are liv­ing on diet coke and cig­a­rettes. who wants to be a fat guy?

  • manorexic

    actu­ally we are liv­ing on diet coke and cig­a­rettes. who wants to be a fat guy?

  • yo0wza

    skinny does not auto­mat­i­cally mean anorexic/​sick.

  • yo0wza

    skinny does not auto­mat­i­cally mean anorexic/​sick.

  • yo0wza

    skinny does not auto­mat­i­cally mean anorexic/​sick.

  • Braz12

    some­times you are just born thin, and you can’t help that.
    i think it’s great that this look is in, but like all looks it will go away.
    it just gives hope to peo­ple like myself that one day i can be a model with­out hav­ing to look
    like im on steroids.

  • Braz12

    some­times you are just born thin, and you can’t help that.
    i think it’s great that this look is in, but like all looks it will go away.
    it just gives hope to peo­ple like myself that one day i can be a model with­out hav­ing to look
    like im on steroids.

  • Braz12

    some­times you are just born thin, and you can’t help that.
    i think it’s great that this look is in, but like all looks it will go away.
    it just gives hope to peo­ple like myself that one day i can be a model with­out hav­ing to look
    like im on steroids.

  • Juliet

    Mmmmyeah-​​I dont remem­ber if I implied that thin was sickly but if I did I didnt mean to-​​at least in hindsight.

  • Juliet

    Mmmmyeah-​​I dont remem­ber if I implied that thin was sickly but if I did I didnt mean to-​​at least in hindsight.

  • Juliet

    Mmmmyeah-​​I dont remem­ber if I implied that thin was sickly but if I did I didnt mean to-​​at least in hindsight.

  • Jean

    Ok, IMO, the skin­nier you are/​the fat­ter you are, the more unhealthy you are, period.

    This is a great arti­cle, but the “I’m nat­u­rally skinny” com­ments tick me off. I’m a nat­u­rally skinny guy, but you know what, no one treated me like some freak or weirdo because I’m skinny. If you wanna blame some­thing for your get­ting put down, blame your­self for allow­ing oth­ers to treat you that way. Grow a spine.
    You can be and do any­thing you want no mat­ter your size so those com­ments say­ing “I’m glad this is the style because I’m nat­u­rally skinny and I don’t need to exer­cise” grow up. You’re prob­a­bly skinny, but you’re most likely just as unhealthy as any fat guy/​girl out there because your lazy and won’t get up from rou­tine and do some­thing phys­i­cal.
    Yes, the first thing that these dis­gust­ing mod­els bring to my mind is the unhealthy. If they were huge obese peo­ple, I’d think the same thing. curves are attrac­tive, no one wants to hang on to a pole/​a blimp.
    You are how you are, and unless you’re a moron you should stop look­ing for some model mag­a­zine to tell you if that’s ok or not.

  • Jean

    Ok, IMO, the skin­nier you are/​the fat­ter you are, the more unhealthy you are, period.

    This is a great arti­cle, but the “I’m nat­u­rally skinny” com­ments tick me off. I’m a nat­u­rally skinny guy, but you know what, no one treated me like some freak or weirdo because I’m skinny. If you wanna blame some­thing for your get­ting put down, blame your­self for allow­ing oth­ers to treat you that way. Grow a spine.
    You can be and do any­thing you want no mat­ter your size so those com­ments say­ing “I’m glad this is the style because I’m nat­u­rally skinny and I don’t need to exer­cise” grow up. You’re prob­a­bly skinny, but you’re most likely just as unhealthy as any fat guy/​girl out there because your lazy and won’t get up from rou­tine and do some­thing phys­i­cal.
    Yes, the first thing that these dis­gust­ing mod­els bring to my mind is the unhealthy. If they were huge obese peo­ple, I’d think the same thing. curves are attrac­tive, no one wants to hang on to a pole/​a blimp.
    You are how you are, and unless you’re a moron you should stop look­ing for some model mag­a­zine to tell you if that’s ok or not.

  • Jean

    Ok, IMO, the skin­nier you are/​the fat­ter you are, the more unhealthy you are, period.

    This is a great arti­cle, but the “I’m nat­u­rally skinny” com­ments tick me off. I’m a nat­u­rally skinny guy, but you know what, no one treated me like some freak or weirdo because I’m skinny. If you wanna blame some­thing for your get­ting put down, blame your­self for allow­ing oth­ers to treat you that way. Grow a spine.
    You can be and do any­thing you want no mat­ter your size so those com­ments say­ing “I’m glad this is the style because I’m nat­u­rally skinny and I don’t need to exer­cise” grow up. You’re prob­a­bly skinny, but you’re most likely just as unhealthy as any fat guy/​girl out there because your lazy and won’t get up from rou­tine and do some­thing phys­i­cal.
    Yes, the first thing that these dis­gust­ing mod­els bring to my mind is the unhealthy. If they were huge obese peo­ple, I’d think the same thing. curves are attrac­tive, no one wants to hang on to a pole/​a blimp.
    You are how you are, and unless you’re a moron you should stop look­ing for some model mag­a­zine to tell you if that’s ok or not.

  • Kim

    Why is it design­ers think we want to see chil­dren mod­el­ling adult fash­ion. I have spent the last two days surf­ing the net look­ing at fash­ion shows and nearly all the mod­els are scrawny lit­tle runts. It was so hard to find a male model who didn’t look as though he still had a face full of bum fluff or still needed his Mommy to tuck him in at night. Where are the real men? The females are no bet­ter. Half the clothes hung list­lessly on them, they had noth­ing there to fill them out. Hello! Who are the design­ers really design­ing for? The mod­els or real peo­ple in the real world. Remem­ber us. We know we’re not all shaped like the mod­els but appar­ently the design­ers don’t. Guys, wake up and smell the coffee.

  • Kim

    Why is it design­ers think we want to see chil­dren mod­el­ling adult fash­ion. I have spent the last two days surf­ing the net look­ing at fash­ion shows and nearly all the mod­els are scrawny lit­tle runts. It was so hard to find a male model who didn’t look as though he still had a face full of bum fluff or still needed his Mommy to tuck him in at night. Where are the real men? The females are no bet­ter. Half the clothes hung list­lessly on them, they had noth­ing there to fill them out. Hello! Who are the design­ers really design­ing for? The mod­els or real peo­ple in the real world. Remem­ber us. We know we’re not all shaped like the mod­els but appar­ently the design­ers don’t. Guys, wake up and smell the coffee.

  • Kim

    Why is it design­ers think we want to see chil­dren mod­el­ling adult fash­ion. I have spent the last two days surf­ing the net look­ing at fash­ion shows and nearly all the mod­els are scrawny lit­tle runts. It was so hard to find a male model who didn’t look as though he still had a face full of bum fluff or still needed his Mommy to tuck him in at night. Where are the real men? The females are no bet­ter. Half the clothes hung list­lessly on them, they had noth­ing there to fill them out. Hello! Who are the design­ers really design­ing for? The mod­els or real peo­ple in the real world. Remem­ber us. We know we’re not all shaped like the mod­els but appar­ently the design­ers don’t. Guys, wake up and smell the coffee.

  • Stephen

    To insight that skinny mod­els are sickly, ill, ugly, or not real­is­tic is as extreme as say­ing that larger mod­els (of all sizes includ­ing nor­mal aver­age sizes) are fat, ugly, sick, etc. It seems that there is no happy ground in the mod­el­ing indus­try and no mat­ter what size you are there will be crit­i­cism. No it is not wrong to voice your opin­ion or even write to the designer your exact feel­ings about the direc­tion their brand is head­ing. How­ever, sling­ing mud and mak­ing accu­sa­tions that may or may not be true cer­tainly does not solve the prob­lem.
    Thin does not mean sickly. A per­son does not have to have an eat­ing dis­or­der or be ill to be thin. For some peo­ple, myself included, being thin is nor­mal. For other peo­ple hav­ing extra meat on their bones is nor­mal and is just as nat­ural.
    Either way I must agree with Kim’s com­ment, “Who are the design­ers really design­ing for? The mod­els or real peo­ple in the real world. Remem­ber us.” It is sad that design­ers only design for a small por­tion of the pop­u­la­tion and an even smaller num­ber who will buy their cre­ation. How­ever there is also some­thing to be said for cloth­ing stores or even shoe stores that only buy cloth­ing for the aver­age per­son and exclude the rest. At the end of the day, odds are your prob­a­bly not going to be wear­ing designer clothes any­way and nei­ther will I. So per­haps the true state­ment is: do not worry who mod­els the clothes because by the time it shows up for an afford­able price, it is scaled to the aver­age per­son instead. As Jon wrote above, “Either way just sit back, relax, and enjoy the show!”

  • Stephen

    To insight that skinny mod­els are sickly, ill, ugly, or not real­is­tic is as extreme as say­ing that larger mod­els (of all sizes includ­ing nor­mal aver­age sizes) are fat, ugly, sick, etc. It seems that there is no happy ground in the mod­el­ing indus­try and no mat­ter what size you are there will be crit­i­cism. No it is not wrong to voice your opin­ion or even write to the designer your exact feel­ings about the direc­tion their brand is head­ing. How­ever, sling­ing mud and mak­ing accu­sa­tions that may or may not be true cer­tainly does not solve the prob­lem.
    Thin does not mean sickly. A per­son does not have to have an eat­ing dis­or­der or be ill to be thin. For some peo­ple, myself included, being thin is nor­mal. For other peo­ple hav­ing extra meat on their bones is nor­mal and is just as nat­ural.
    Either way I must agree with Kim’s com­ment, “Who are the design­ers really design­ing for? The mod­els or real peo­ple in the real world. Remem­ber us.” It is sad that design­ers only design for a small por­tion of the pop­u­la­tion and an even smaller num­ber who will buy their cre­ation. How­ever there is also some­thing to be said for cloth­ing stores or even shoe stores that only buy cloth­ing for the aver­age per­son and exclude the rest. At the end of the day, odds are your prob­a­bly not going to be wear­ing designer clothes any­way and nei­ther will I. So per­haps the true state­ment is: do not worry who mod­els the clothes because by the time it shows up for an afford­able price, it is scaled to the aver­age per­son instead. As Jon wrote above, “Either way just sit back, relax, and enjoy the show!”

  • Stephen

    To insight that skinny mod­els are sickly, ill, ugly, or not real­is­tic is as extreme as say­ing that larger mod­els (of all sizes includ­ing nor­mal aver­age sizes) are fat, ugly, sick, etc. It seems that there is no happy ground in the mod­el­ing indus­try and no mat­ter what size you are there will be crit­i­cism. No it is not wrong to voice your opin­ion or even write to the designer your exact feel­ings about the direc­tion their brand is head­ing. How­ever, sling­ing mud and mak­ing accu­sa­tions that may or may not be true cer­tainly does not solve the prob­lem.
    Thin does not mean sickly. A per­son does not have to have an eat­ing dis­or­der or be ill to be thin. For some peo­ple, myself included, being thin is nor­mal. For other peo­ple hav­ing extra meat on their bones is nor­mal and is just as nat­ural.
    Either way I must agree with Kim’s com­ment, “Who are the design­ers really design­ing for? The mod­els or real peo­ple in the real world. Remem­ber us.” It is sad that design­ers only design for a small por­tion of the pop­u­la­tion and an even smaller num­ber who will buy their cre­ation. How­ever there is also some­thing to be said for cloth­ing stores or even shoe stores that only buy cloth­ing for the aver­age per­son and exclude the rest. At the end of the day, odds are your prob­a­bly not going to be wear­ing designer clothes any­way and nei­ther will I. So per­haps the true state­ment is: do not worry who mod­els the clothes because by the time it shows up for an afford­able price, it is scaled to the aver­age per­son instead. As Jon wrote above, “Either way just sit back, relax, and enjoy the show!”

  • Alli­son

    This is dis­gust­ing. There is no need to be skinny. That leads to anerexia, which isn’t good on any level. The more I look at mod­els the more I think, “wow, they look so weird. No shape. Only there bone struc­ture.” this is very unhealthy it should change. This is going to lead to really bad prob­lems in today’s gen­er­a­tion. Peo­ple will see those and think I want to be skinny but the way there body is shapped it’s not pos­si­ble for them to be really skinny. There­for it leads to anerexia which is nvr good. Design­ers should have them as they are if they come buff keep em buff if they come skinny keep em skinny but don’t make them
    Into some­thing they aren’t. That’s just wrong