Editorial – “Illuminati”

The Fashionisto

/

Published July 22, 2009

illuminati4Pin

It turns out that there is a so-called triple threat when it comes to fashion photography. Acting as photographer, art director and stylist, Antonella Arismendi treats us to a peculiar editorial from D Mag. Starring Alex Nestor and Yamil Castiglione, the finished product is out of this world–paying no heed to traditional gender roles. Bring on the lace, netting and sequins…

illuminati2Pin
illuminati1Pin
illuminati3Pin
illuminati5Pin
illuminati6Pin
illuminati7Pin

Pictures from Larapixie

Explore Recent Updates

33 thoughts on “Editorial – “Illuminati””

  22. I didn’t care for any of the photographs. The illuminati symbolism is lame, and the photographer rather than capturing the essence of the guy’s being photographed, just happens to capture their emptyness. Very boring, and very typical of today.

    Too much triangle/pyramid/illuminati/egyptian symbolism going on today within the fashion industry, just letting those who are “aware” know who have sold their souls.

  23. I didn’t care for any of the photographs. The illuminati symbolism is lame, and the photographer rather than capturing the essence of the guy’s being photographed, just happens to capture their emptyness. Very boring, and very typical of today.

    Too much triangle/pyramid/illuminati/egyptian symbolism going on today within the fashion industry, just letting those who are “aware” know who have sold their souls.

  24. I didn’t care for any of the photographs. The illuminati symbolism is lame, and the photographer rather than capturing the essence of the guy’s being photographed, just happens to capture their emptyness. Very boring, and very typical of today.

    Too much triangle/pyramid/illuminati/egyptian symbolism going on today within the fashion industry, just letting those who are “aware” know who have sold their souls.

  25. That’s lame also because this illuminati trend has been dead for 6 month now, so trying to act all “cool, dark and secret” in 2009 with this empty symbolism that only show the level zero of esoteric culture, is uber lame.

    Gay fashion use to be sharp till the 90, now it’s just a bunch of lame young ignorant selling their ass and souls

  26. That’s lame also because this illuminati trend has been dead for 6 month now, so trying to act all “cool, dark and secret” in 2009 with this empty symbolism that only show the level zero of esoteric culture, is uber lame.

    Gay fashion use to be sharp till the 90, now it’s just a bunch of lame young ignorant selling their ass and souls

  27. That’s lame also because this illuminati trend has been dead for 6 month now, so trying to act all “cool, dark and secret” in 2009 with this empty symbolism that only show the level zero of esoteric culture, is uber lame.

    Gay fashion use to be sharp till the 90, now it’s just a bunch of lame young ignorant selling their ass and souls

  28. waww…… it’s kind of iluminatii crazyy stuff..
    like it like itt …..
    the all eyes can see really representt
    like the stylee… bravo for the stylist

  29. waww…… it’s kind of iluminatii crazyy stuff..
    like it like itt …..
    the all eyes can see really representt
    like the stylee… bravo for the stylist

  30. waww…… it’s kind of iluminatii crazyy stuff..
    like it like itt …..
    the all eyes can see really representt
    like the stylee… bravo for the stylist

Comments are closed.