Jean Paul Gaultier Spring 2010

The Fashionisto

/

Published June 25, 2009

/

Updated March 27, 2015

jpg12Pin

Known for rebelling against the hand of conformity, it is not a surprise that the Jean Paul Gaultier spring 2010 collection breaks with traditional gender roles. Solid skirts and bustiers season an eclectic mix of reverse coloring, horizontal gradients and both prison and nautical stripes. The bustier acts as the collection’s central piece–appearing underneath a great deal of blazers as well as on its own. Contrasting trim adds depth to a collection geared towards a younger adventurous consumer. Bold and weightless, the collection’s sheer jackets are no surprise. If the aforementioned elements are not enough to warrant variety, Gaultier throws denim into the mix, not only cutting out swatches of fabric, but incorporating a tangled arrangement of bondage straps. As a final note, the collection’s persistent use of translucent Converse solidify its intended reach for a younger audience who is willing to put their trust in Gaultier, lay back and enjoy the ride.

jpg02Pin
jpg03Pin
jpg04Pin
jpg05Pin
jpg06Pin
jpg07Pin
jpg08Pin
jpg09Pin
jpg10Pin
jpg11Pin
jpg01Pin
jpg13Pin
jpg14Pin
jpg15Pin
jpg16Pin
jpg17Pin
jpg18Pin
jpg19Pin
jpg20Pin
jpg21Pin
jpg22Pin
jpg23Pin
jpg24Pin
jpg25Pin
jpg26Pin
jpg27Pin
jpg28Pin
jpg29Pin
jpg30Pin

Pictures from The Fashion Spot

Explore Recent Updates

6 thoughts on “Jean Paul Gaultier Spring 2010”

  1. I feel like the very last look should have been the starting point. The rest, I felt like I had seen it before, and could see a trendy person wearing it right now in Paris or London. The last look shows us, I think, true (or at least closer-to) androgyny–the other uses of the bustiers were ridiculous, more drag than (good) design, not to mention they were paired with pretty much ordinary pants/jackets and (ugh) over-used Converses, so that the bustier says, “Hey, I’m not to be taken seriously, I’m just another “shocking” thing to be shown on catwalks so people say ‘Oh he’s innovative’ but then never really be sold, or sold alongside better-selling clothes”. Not only is the last look androgynous, its proportions are also different, it shows good design, and it’s simple (remember Occam’s razor?). Of course part of it is the (rather feminine-looking) model, but it was refreshing to see after a whole collection of various inter-collection trends (prison stripes) and annoying add-ons that won’t make it to stores. Why can’t designers be honest? Either show sure-sell, trendy, and contemporary pieces, the ones that make it to stores anyway for such big designers, or show innovative pieces that show good, forward-thinking design and are unfamiliar to all who see and buy them.

  2. I feel like the very last look should have been the starting point. The rest, I felt like I had seen it before, and could see a trendy person wearing it right now in Paris or London. The last look shows us, I think, true (or at least closer-to) androgyny–the other uses of the bustiers were ridiculous, more drag than (good) design, not to mention they were paired with pretty much ordinary pants/jackets and (ugh) over-used Converses, so that the bustier says, “Hey, I’m not to be taken seriously, I’m just another “shocking” thing to be shown on catwalks so people say ‘Oh he’s innovative’ but then never really be sold, or sold alongside better-selling clothes”. Not only is the last look androgynous, its proportions are also different, it shows good design, and it’s simple (remember Occam’s razor?). Of course part of it is the (rather feminine-looking) model, but it was refreshing to see after a whole collection of various inter-collection trends (prison stripes) and annoying add-ons that won’t make it to stores. Why can’t designers be honest? Either show sure-sell, trendy, and contemporary pieces, the ones that make it to stores anyway for such big designers, or show innovative pieces that show good, forward-thinking design and are unfamiliar to all who see and buy them.

  3. I feel like the very last look should have been the starting point. The rest, I felt like I had seen it before, and could see a trendy person wearing it right now in Paris or London. The last look shows us, I think, true (or at least closer-to) androgyny–the other uses of the bustiers were ridiculous, more drag than (good) design, not to mention they were paired with pretty much ordinary pants/jackets and (ugh) over-used Converses, so that the bustier says, “Hey, I’m not to be taken seriously, I’m just another “shocking” thing to be shown on catwalks so people say ‘Oh he’s innovative’ but then never really be sold, or sold alongside better-selling clothes”. Not only is the last look androgynous, its proportions are also different, it shows good design, and it’s simple (remember Occam’s razor?). Of course part of it is the (rather feminine-looking) model, but it was refreshing to see after a whole collection of various inter-collection trends (prison stripes) and annoying add-ons that won’t make it to stores. Why can’t designers be honest? Either show sure-sell, trendy, and contemporary pieces, the ones that make it to stores anyway for such big designers, or show innovative pieces that show good, forward-thinking design and are unfamiliar to all who see and buy them.

Comments are closed.